Skip to page content or skip to Accesskey List.
Search evolt.org
evolt.org login: or register

Work

Main Page Content

Stock Photography Resources for Web Designers

Rated 4.03 (Ratings: 10) (Add your rating)

Log in to add a comment
(39 comments so far)

Want more?

 
Picture of isaac

Isaac

Member info | Full bio

User since: December 13, 1998

Last login: October 27, 2007

Articles written: 67

Try to design and build a Web site using poor images and, more often than not, you'll end up with less-than-optimal results. We can't always be lucky enough to have clients providing us with CDs loaded with professionally photographed images, or willing to pay for quality photographs to be taken especially for the site. But, if you're stuck with a job, and all the client has supplied is a shitty bitmapped logo, a single page Word document, and a floppy disk with three, small, over-compressed images, don't sit there and complain (and yes, I've definitely done that in the past).

What is stock photography?

Stock photography is well used by experienced print designers, but many Web designers are self-taught and working in a comparably fresh industry. Awareness of stock resources, especially amongst newer freelancers, is probably quite low. Here's the low-down: you can purchase a license to use certain images within your design from companies who, in turn, pay photographers to build up their libraries of quality images in numerous categories. And, not all of it is the corporate imagery many of us have grown used to seeing.

Additionally, it's not the trashy animated GIFs that newbie Web designers are well-known for grabbing from freebie archives. ;)

For example, one resource, PhotoDisc, has categories such as Agriculture, Wildlife, Sports, Fantasy, Food, Transportation, etc. It is searchable based on helpful keywords that describe the content and style. Here's an example:

"color image, vertical, outdoors, center, lifestyles, couple, holding hands, love, romance, man, woman, young man, young woman, young adult, adult, 20s, smiling, waist up, casual dress, caucasian, male and female, men and women, two people, day, new york city, new york state, mid-atlantic usa, usa, north america, photography, selective focus"

You can see how keywords such as "color image", "vertical", "selective focus", etc. could really help you locate the image you need. Alternately, you might require a blurred, horizontal, tinted style - and it's easy to search for.

Where can I find it?

There are a number of Web sites conveniently offering stock photography over the Internet. You don't have to order a CD, wait for it to arrive, and then find that it doesn't have the imagery you want. You simply browse and preview, pay for what you want to use, and then download it.

Here are a few URLs to get you started (thanks Marlene); I'll leave it up to others to comment at the end of this piece with information on each of these, and perhaps some more good resources.

How much will it cost me?

I'll base my commentary on PhotoDisc, but a lot of this may apply to other stock sites.

On PhotoDisc, you can expect to find comping images and lightboxes. Lightboxes are kind of like a favourites or bookmark list that you can add comments to and email to colleagues working on the same project. Comping images are small, lower quality images provided free to registered members (registration itself is also free) to use in developing mock-ups for client perusal. The idea is that you then purchase the images you'll need once you have approval of your client. This saves you buying stuff that they might not like.

For Web use, you'll generally be fine with 600K, 72 DPI images currently available for US$29.95. If you need a smaller area of the image for higher detail, or want to use it within a corresponding print document, you might be interested in the 300DPI 10MB and 28MB options (available for US$99.95 and US$179.95 respectively). Now, at first, this may seem like a decent chunk of cash for a picture you'll use once in a site, but consider it an investment in your client, and your portfolio. Oh, and if you structure your charging conveniently, you can bill the cost of the image to them.

What can I do with it?

Read their license(s) for the exact permissions, but in a nutshell, you're allowed to use the image you've purchased in your Web, print, CD ROM work. You can't resell it or make it available for download as a standalone image, which is fair enough. Neither can you use it within pornographic, libellous, defamatory or otherwise unlawful works. Examples of some permitted applications: Web sites, CD ROMs, brochures, advertising campaigns, books, packaging for music/video/software, cards/posters, exhibitions, etc. The PhotoDisc license permits up to 10 people by default (non-concurrently) to use an image for design purposes (you can contact them for other arrangements). PhotoDisc also requests a specific artist credit underneath photos, or on a separate credits page (you could consider linking this from your site footer).

A bit of advice for the eager image-hunter:

Before you run off to joyfully browse the stock sites and apologise for all those times you've complained about lack of source images, here are some final tips. Utilise comping images - often they're enough to sell a client on the design you're presenting, and they can save you buying images you might not eventually use. Also, take care not to pick overused graphics. If you see an image on another site, perhaps avoid using it on your own; it'll just look silly. Either specifically find images which are unusual, or butcher them a bit in PhotoShop to change tints, blurs, or whatever your preferred style of image torture.

Finally, keep your portfolio in mind - the examples you show future clients really help you stay in business or keep your job. Most often, the differences between a site using crap source images and one using professional graphics are amazing.

I encourage anyone with questions or information relevant to this article to comment below. Tell us about your experiences (good or bad), etc.

isaac
isaac@triplezero.com.au

Isaac is a designer from Adelaide, South Australia, where he has run Triplezero for almost a decade.

He was a member and administrator of evolt.org since its founding in 1998, designed the current site, and was a regular contributor on evolt.org's direction-setting discussion list, theforum.

On the side, he runs Opinion, Hoops SA, Confessions, Daily Male, and Comments, as well as maintaining a travel gallery at Bigtrip.org.

Submitted by aardvark on October 31, 2000 - 14:07.

I always try to purchase the high-resolution images whenever possible. All too often I use elements in companion print designs for the client, or even zoomed in pieces for sites. It's nice to have the flexibility to do whatever you need down the road with a high-res image. Also, keep in mind that while a high resolution image may cost US$129.00, you might be better off buying the entire CD for around US$250.00. If you are like me and pass on the cost of the image to the client, you'll still shell out some extra guilders for the CD, but it's worth it to have the library of images in high resolution. Even if you only need low-res images, if the project requires a few images, it may be more cost-effective to buy the CD. And never underestimate how often you'll go back to the CDs for which you've already paid in new projects (especially those not-for-profits).

login or register to post comments

Submitted by olineham on October 31, 2000 - 23:35.

gettyone.com is an umbrella site - one search returns aggregated results from PhotoDisc, Eyewire, Hulton Getty, Stone, and other big stock photo sites. The search results also tell you whether the photo is "Licenced" or "Royalty-free".

login or register to post comments

Submitted by jbuchanan on November 1, 2000 - 11:37.

I wanted to add a newer site from which my company purchased some photos recently. http://www.thinkstock.com/ Their philosophy is "one-price per usage," so you can download low, medium, or high-resolution versions of any image you purchase. All images are royalty-free ...

login or register to post comments

Submitted by mckaig on November 1, 2000 - 12:18.

I wanted to clear up some inaccuracies here - between Stock Photography and Royalty-Free Stock Photography. Royalty-Free stock means that you purchase based on size of download - like the 600K Isaac mentioned. You can then use this image in many different media (see licensing agreement on each individual site for the details, but it's usually pretty broad). Some examples of royalty-free are: http://www.photodisc.com/ http://www.eyewire.com/ http://www.wonderfile.com/ Rights-protected (licensed) stock photography is different. The pricing is based on where you're going to use the image - on the Internet, in a brochure, etc. The images are ALWAYS of much higher quality and resolution - up to 5000 pixels across is not unusual - and since they are rights-protected, you can purchase exclusivity - meaning that none of your competitors could ever use the same image. The prices are higher, but depending on your use, maybe not as high as you'd think. You get what you pay for, believe me. If you've been doing design for a long time, it doesn't take much to recognize the same PhotoDisc images on many different web sites. Without rights control, your competitor has every right to go out and use the same royalty-free image on his site as you did on yours. Some examples of rights-protected stock agencies: http://www.masterfile.com/ http://www.tonystone.com/ http://www.fpg.com/

login or register to post comments

Submitted by mrnick on November 8, 2000 - 08:09.

I just discovered iStockPhoto.com. It has a limited variety of photos, but they are all free to use. The images are huge (the one I have is 3663 x 2463 pixels) and the quality is not bad. Check it out: http://www.istockphoto.com

login or register to post comments

Submitted by f@frankpetronio.com on November 8, 2000 - 12:01.

Once you start looking at stock photos you start to see the same ones used over and over again - I'd rather see fewer but better ORIGINAL images than yet another generic PhotoDisc loaded site. Web designers need to convince clients that new and original art work is better than settling for all these crappy stock photos.

login or register to post comments

Submitted by aardvark on November 8, 2000 - 21:17.

Other than the fact that this article is about stock photography (although it does allude to illustration as well by some of the URLs listed), I agree with 'f' above about original photos instead of stock. However, budget is always an issue. There are many cases where I have done tiny or small projects for clients where a photo shoot would be more expensive than the cost of the site (or update, or page, etc.). There are other cases where the client would rather roll out a feature of a site (discussion lists, catalog, etc.) instead of spending the money on a professional photographer. Most of the sites I work on have specific business goals, and the photos don't decide the feel or identity of a site, they merely enhance the interface. And the money doesn't come from the marketing budget, either, but often from operations budgets. This doesn't mean you can't propose it, but don't be surprised if the client pulls it out of the project in favor of technical features which they view as revenue-generating. But if you do have the budget, look to your local photographers (and illustrators), because they're hungry for business in many cases and are generally quite accommodating.

login or register to post comments

Submitted by gpupurs on November 15, 2000 - 09:39.

I've found Photo.net to also be a good free source of photos for non-profit/personal sites with no budget to speak of. It's a community site for photographers. They've got two areas, the Gallery, where people can upload photos to build their own portfolio pages, and the Stock area, where the site's owner, Phil Greenspun, has release over 6000 photos to the public, most at hi-res scans of up to 2000x3000. Be sure to respect the Gallery contributor's wishes, however, and don't use the photo if they didn't grant permissions for its use (each photo has info on what it can be used for). http://www.photo.net/gallery/ http://www.photo.net/stock/

login or register to post comments

Submitted by colin on November 20, 2000 - 18:57.

Both Isaac and JBuchanan mention Tony Stone, and while that company does indeed have high quality stock photos, their licensing terms can be very bad. We had a time limit when we used some of their images, for instance, so after a while we had to "renew" our license. In any case, another rights-protected agency is The Stock Market: http://www.stockmarketphoto.com/ They also have royalty-free images.

login or register to post comments

Submitted by deeperhue on December 4, 2000 - 23:51.

I would suggest Photonica.com... the image quality is excellent, new and fresh. They are also not very well-known, so I'm assuming prices would be reasonable, although I can't back that up.

login or register to post comments

some free high res from Sun

Submitted by kerkness on February 21, 2001 - 12:40.

Just thought some people might be interested in this link. Not a huge selection of images. But they are all free and come in really nice high-res so you can use them for print (if you need to). http://www.sun.com/smrc/photos/

login or register to post comments

Stock Photography from Philip Greenspun

Submitted by doe on March 20, 2001 - 06:32.

Philip Greenspun has more then 6000 on-line images, that you can use for free, plus quite a few interesting links. Take a look at http://www.photo.net/stock/

login or register to post comments

Producing stock photography..

Submitted by nmyers on April 12, 2001 - 10:45.

..I'm think of investing in a digital camera, and producing my own online archive or CDs of photo's for "tight-budget" designers, like myself, to design with. All I need to do is work out what a good camera is, and how to use it :o)

login or register to post comments

Don't use stock pictures

Submitted by f@frankpetronio.com on April 12, 2001 - 11:05.

Alot of time stock photos are used as crutches to make up from lousy content. Why not revolt and refuse to use yet another picture of a business handshake? Or the racially and gender diverse politically correct fake business meeting photo? The same damn picture of earth from Apollo 8 that's on 10,000 web sites. Just say no.

I rather have a clean site like evolt than to wait around for more worthless stock photos to download. Or better yet, do the photography yourself and make relevant real images.

login or register to post comments

Legal issues and stock photography

Submitted by danfascia on July 29, 2001 - 13:21.

What are the legal implications if one were to download, edit and use fragments of comping images in commercial projects?

login or register to post comments

Legal issues

Submitted by MartinB on July 31, 2001 - 09:41.

The only one I know well is Photodisc, and in their case, expect a call from the lawyers. Comping images are very, very clearly limited to comping use. If you want to use an image in the final commercial work, you pay a fee. Photodisc allow you to license 1 image at a time - it's not expensive.

I wouldn't be surprised if other commercial operators were the same

login or register to post comments

Legal issues

Submitted by aardvark on August 1, 2001 - 08:27.

Comping images are just that — comping images. If you use one or a part of one in a project, you have violated the agreement you made just to get access to them. You can be sued and they will win.

login or register to post comments

What about non-commercial projects?

Submitted by unreal on August 9, 2001 - 14:20.

I suppose this would probably be in the site's TOS, but what about using them in non-commercial projects, such as a personal site? Just Wondering..

login or register to post comments

Still legal issues

Submitted by aardvark on August 11, 2001 - 21:11.

Personal use is right out. At least for places like PhotoDisc. Read through the licensing info on the comping images for a site, but I think you'll find that for any site that requires you to pay for images for commercial use, it's right out.

login or register to post comments

Hemera Photo Ojbects

Submitted by devwoman on August 18, 2001 - 18:46.

I use Hemera Photo-Objects. I don't know if you consider that stock photography, but 50,000 images for USD99.00 was worth it for me. I own both of the larger collections. An additional source of royalty free images is: http://pigallery.designheaven.com/ - PhotoImpact Users Photo Gallery. Sue

login or register to post comments

Creativepro.com

Submitted by Woggz on October 11, 2001 - 11:36.

Creativepro.com offers a useful search of some of the better stock sites, including Corbis, PhotoDisc, Wonderfile, and others, with direct links for viewing and purchasing. They also have a font search and freelance exchange for us designer types.

login or register to post comments

layered PSDs...

Submitted by aardvark on December 9, 2001 - 02:18.

I just stumbled across a site that has its stock photos in layered Photoshop format:
http://www.digitalvisiononline.com/infinity/

login or register to post comments

Interesting Royalty free website

Submitted by drakola on February 27, 2002 - 07:47.

Neorom have an interesting website that features a subscription-based service for royalty-free media.

You get access to their photographs and also CD-quality sound loops that can be used in a variety of projects.

http://www.neorom.com

login or register to post comments

LuckyPix offers designers unique imagery

Submitted by mlaaker on March 28, 2002 - 09:38.

If you haven't tried LuckyPix, you should check it out. They are selling some pretty wild photographs with the common premise of being "serendipitous moments," i.e. genuinely lucky shots that capture a point in time or mood in an amazing way.

You can search and download comps online, and their search process is pretty easy to use. They're priced comparable to Tony Stone (for rights-protected) and PhotoDisc (for royalty-free).

login or register to post comments

Good suggestions

Submitted by KT on November 1, 2002 - 15:55.

Good suggestions, all. I especially like LuckyPix site - some unique and interesting photos out there.

Comstock has a new image division called Flat Rate. This probably isn't entirely accurate, but I think of it as a hybrid between royalty free and rights protected.

login or register to post comments

Free Stock

Submitted by ogston.com on June 9, 2003 - 08:38.

I dont know if anyone has been to this site before: www.sxc.hu as i only came across it recently. They offer free photos for private and commercial use. The photos can be created and uploaded by anyone, so some are bad, but some of them really are good, especially for those designers with tight budgets.

login or register to post comments

A site with lots of choices

Submitted by gifrancis on June 20, 2003 - 05:37.

This is a nice place to look around:
http://www.digitalthread.com/resauce/stock1.html

Great suggestions ppl!

login or register to post comments

Another great resource

Submitted by design7 on July 20, 2003 - 02:10.

I have found a very nice european stock photo house named http://image100.com . Their photos are quite stylish and have a distinctive look that may work well in certan types of websites. i also think that http://istockphoto is one of the greatest bargains on the web for usable high quality images

login or register to post comments

Site Suggestion

Submitted by Emalina on September 29, 2003 - 14:14.

Check this site out... www.fotosearch.com. It's a great collection of rights-managed and royalty-free images from nearly all the sites discussed on this page (Getty, Tony Stone, Photodsic, Eyewire, Comstock, Corbis, etc).

login or register to post comments

Stocking up

Submitted by agpix on November 9, 2003 - 03:01.

I'd like to add another stock library to the list of those worth checking out, because it's a rising star. Alamy is a UK-based (but entirely digital) agency which gives far more control over its images to the contributing photographers, resulting in a far less "stocky" selection. Using good photography can transform a site, and while care has to be taken to avoid bloating downloads, the extra few kilobytes can hook a potential customer if used judiciously. Far better one or two carefully chosen, strong photos than a site wounded by bad homegrown pics. With the increasing uptake of CSS, we are experiencing another rash of lookalike sites (ah, the love affair with the dotted line has begun!). Professional photography is a good way to differentiate a site from its competitors. Using the same royalty-free disc until you've worn it out doesn't count! Agencies like alamy are very fairly priced and web designers have no excuse not to provide their clients with first-rate images. They will thank you for it.

login or register to post comments

Site Suggestion

Submitted by swedee on February 24, 2004 - 15:26.

PixiBit images Is a new agency. They are focusing on quality images which I think shows in the images they allready have. Worth checking out at least guys.

login or register to post comments

New Stock photography

Submitted by hroldan on April 21, 2004 - 13:10.

Hi, you can check Guatemala Stock Photography, it has more than 1,000 high resolution Royaltee Free pictures for personal and commercial use. It features images about the country from architecture, nature, churches and more. It is so far, the biggest collection of pictures from Guatemala on the web. Useful for travel and editorial sites. It's landscapes are great for cool looking nature-ecological sites.

login or register to post comments

Free to download

Submitted by urbancow on June 23, 2004 - 04:05.

Freestock.co.uk has pictures that are free to download and use (if you link to the site)

login or register to post comments

another free site

Submitted by drax on June 23, 2004 - 08:15.

another free site is barrysfreephotos not great resolution, but you get what you pay for.

login or register to post comments

Stock site for gambling images and betting

Submitted by Bdemay on October 11, 2004 - 06:06.

These guys offer royalty free for gaming stuff and betting (casino, poker etc) http://www.cutanddeal.com

login or register to post comments

sorry..

Submitted by Bdemay on October 11, 2004 - 06:07.

sorry, meant to put the link Cut and deal

login or register to post comments

Resource and legal issues

Submitted by Alfatrion on November 22, 2004 - 08:19.

About the legal issues. I beleave they will only win if they have some form of rigths, copyrigth or otherwise. These rigths all expire at some time. In my country copyrigth expires when the author is 70 years dead.

login or register to post comments

Why not try independent photographer stock photo sites?

Submitted by Heironymous on November 5, 2006 - 19:25.

Many photographers have set up niche stock photo web sites where they license their own work as high resolution stock photos. The quality of the work is usually far superior to what you find on the major stock photo sites and you are supporting a small business rather than a huge corporation. My own site focuses on New York City stock photos, and stock photos of Washington DC. --Andrew

login or register to post comments

Stock Illustrations

Submitted by kennygadams on February 6, 2008 - 20:10.

I found this page to be a good resource and would like to contribute a stock illustration site that I have been developing since March of 2007. Clip Art Of.com - Stock clipart illustration search portal that features thousands of royalty-free clipart images from more than 100 artists. All images are available as art prints. They also offer free image hosting and free emoticons.

login or register to post comments

The access keys for this page are: ALT (Control on a Mac) plus:

evolt.orgEvolt.org is an all-volunteer resource for web developers made up of a discussion list, a browser archive, and member-submitted articles. This article is the property of its author, please do not redistribute or use elsewhere without checking with the author.