Skip to page content or skip to Accesskey List.
Search evolt.org
evolt.org login: or register

Work

Main Page Content

A wonderful world of multiple monitors

Rated 3.92 (Ratings: 2) (Add your rating)

Log in to add a comment
(13 comments so far)

Want more?

 
Picture of isaac

Isaac

Member info | Full bio

User since: December 13, 1998

Last login: October 27, 2007

Articles written: 67

The days of dual displays being for rich designers are behind us. Yet, today, many people still haven't given much thought to the possibility of using multiple monitors. Why not? Software used frequently by an average Web developer, such as Dreamweaver, Photoshop, etc, are introducing more and more palettes to clutter the screen, and everyone is working with multiple applications at once, right?

The answer isn't always to splurge on a 21" monitor. A very affordable and realistic possibility is to invest in a dual display setup. It's not just a Mac thing any more as it once was when Macs owned such a huge share of the design market, and it's not limited to Win98 or Win2K either. And it's not a difficult or scary thing to attempt.

I first tried dual monitors during my training in multimedia, and after that I couldn't go back. I blew some cash on new video cards and a couple thousand on some monitors, and from then on, my home setup was a dream to work with. Every day at work on a crusty 17" was torture - I'd be dying to get home. Anyway, in this article, I plan on explaining how my setup works, and why I like (ok, absolutely adore) it. First of all:

The details

Currently, my temporary development machine, which I use mostly with ColdFusion Studio and Photoshop, is a PII 233, 256MB RAM, etc. I have a 21" NEC MultiSync XE21, and a Samsung SyncMaster 15GLi side by side, and the displays are driven by an AGP Matrox Millennium G400 Dual Head with 32MB SGRAM, which has two monitor inputs. For my operating system, I use NT Workstation.

Both monitors are run at a resolution of 1280x1024, giving me a total resolution of 2560x1024. Matrox software accompanies the drivers, and allows me to do a number of interesting things, including using the second display as a clone of the first, or even as a zoomed view of the first that follows the mouse pointer. It sounds cool, but I have to admit that I'm just too busy to try it out. If it worked with Quake3Arena, giving me an ever-present zoomed view of my target, then I'd probably get over-excited and have a heart attack...

An old gripe of people using dual displays is that when a dialog pops up, it's right in the middle - and thus split over two screens. The Matrox software solves this - I can choose whether I want to centre dialog boxes in the parent program window, in the parent program display, on either display 1 or 2, or(my current setting) whichever display my mouse pointer is sitting in. Very cool.

The costs

The initial costs of buying a larger monitor, or setting up dual displays, will be absorbed by greater productivity once you have the screen real estate. No more digging around palettes just to get to the area of image you want to airbrush. Far less window shuffling when you want to compare your Web page in Internet Explorer and Netscape. Hell, I can have Netscape 3, Netscape 4, Netscape 6, and IE5, all showing the same page at 640x1024 if I want, without *any* overlap.

You'll need two displays, and some kind of video hardware to support it. In the past, I've used two Matrox Millennium II 4MB cards, one to run each monitor, and the performance was excellent. Friends have run a Matrox card alongside something else - there are a number of solutions, and I'll leave it up to members to post their comments at the end of the article, detailing their setups.

However, now the G400, amongst other benefits, gives me 3D support for Quake, and is very affordable. Currently, this card, from my preferred wholesaler, is AU$370. North Americans will probably get it significantly cheaper. A version with even faster RAMDAC is available for about AU$90 extra, and there are 16MB versions that are cheaper.

As for the monitors, you've probably already got one. If it's a 15", then make this your new palettes monitor, and splurge on something big for your primary display. If your current monitor is already nice, then just buy a cheapy 15", or 17" (they'll cost you AU$285 - AU$465 for a good brand). If you're loaded, then buy two 21"ers and fall in love.

So, if you have the 15" already, to upgrade to dual displays with your primary monitor as a 17" or 19" Viewsonic, and a G400 32MB, you'll be spending AU$700 - $1500. If you have the nice, big monitor already, to bang on a cheapy and the G400 will cost you AU$500-650. Once again, your prices will probably be a lot cheaper in the US or Canada.

The installation

This is not a hard process. You have a video card and a new monitor. You slap the video card into your box, and plug the displays into the back. Turn on the computer. Install the drivers and software. That's it.

The results

The result is a huge resolution, spread across two monitors. When you move your mouse towards the right, it'll jump across to the other monitor. It's just one of those things you have to see and try for yourself. For someone who uses a dual display setup every day of the year, it's hard to imagine how someone couldn't know what I was talking about (if that makes sense).

The advantages

I'm going to run through how I use my setup, and leave it to others to add comments on how they do the same with their applications. If there aren't screenshots included initially, then don't worry - I'll be adding some later.

First, the wonderful beast: Photoshop. I stretch the application window across both windows, but I leave a gap on the left showing just enough of my first column of desktop icons for them to be recognisable, and the same on the far right, leaving ICQ and MSN Messenger visible. I sit the tools palette towards the left, and throw everything else on the right. The king of all palettes - layers - sits on the left side of my palette monitor where it's most easily accessible. Everything else runs along the bottom - including the info palette so that I can see RGB values of colours, selection dimensions, etc.

Usually, I will have my main "view" of the image I'm working on, on my primary display. I keep a second view of it, on the other monitor, at 100%. That way, when I'm zoomed on my main display, and working in at 800-1600%, I can see the results, live, in the "real-world" without flicking in-and-out and worrying about the image having to redraw every time.

ColdFusion Studio is not so palette-happy by default, but you can "snap" off the menus and place them wherever you want on the screen. It can be handy, after validating, to place the results window on your palette monitor, while you work through the code at full screen.

All that aside, the strength of dual monitors when coding comes from being able to have your code up on screen, as well as a number of browser windows, side-by-side, to compare results. It's just one of those things you have to try for yourself.

Extra screen space is also great for everyday stuff, like shifting files around, dragging text from one window to another, reading/tracking the loading progress of multiple Web sites at once, etc. I like to keep my ICQ and MSN Messenger windows on the far right, so that they don't distract me when I'm focusing on the primary display, but a quick glance can still show me who's online, without having to waste space within my main work area, or click the taskbar to open the window.

What's next?

Well, I'm considering the possibility of running two G400's simultaneously, and adding some new monitors to give me four displays. I've read that Windows 98 at least will support nine monitors. If WinNT/Win2K can do four, and multiple G400's will run happily together, then my next freelance job might pay for this step.

Questions and other options

I encourage everyone who runs dual displays to post their comments below. What cards and setups do you recommend? Any tips and tricks?

And if you're interested in multiple monitors, and have a question, please feel free to post too - everyone (myself included) will be more than happy to help you out if we can.

isaac

Isaac is a designer from Adelaide, South Australia, where he has run Triplezero for almost a decade.

He was a member and administrator of evolt.org since its founding in 1998, designed the current site, and was a regular contributor on evolt.org's direction-setting discussion list, theforum.

On the side, he runs Opinion, Hoops SA, Confessions, Daily Male, and Comments, as well as maintaining a travel gallery at Bigtrip.org.

Submitted by mrnick on April 18, 2000 - 21:08.

Once you have had a taste for dual monitors it is hard to go back. The main advantage for me is that I can code in one window and preview in the other. I don't have to get arthritis from Alt-Tabb ing any more. I am using Windows 98 SE, PII 350, 32Mb Matrox G400, Viewsonic 19", Olympic 17". I have tried using two odd video cards (Viper 550 and some other generic PCI), but had limited success. The card i bought for the second one was crashing my computer so I got the G400 and never looked back. Like Isaac said, it is not expensive and the productivity increase is worth it.

login or register to post comments

Submitted by damclean on April 18, 2000 - 23:47.

I came upon dual monitors by a complete mistake. The Mac that I bought 2 years ago didn't come with AV output and I needed to put a Powerpoint presentation on Video. I couldn't get anyone to do it and so finally I ended up buying an ATI Xclaim VR with 4MB of RAM to plunk in my machine. Little did I realise that the old 15" Packard Bell monitor that I had lying around worked just fine on my on-board video card, so I just plugged them both in and voila! Mac's have great support for multiple monitors built right into the OS. I'm very pleased with my video card addition, though it is beginning to show its age as I tried to run Madden NFL 2000 on it and the video was choppy. Did someone say Voodoo 5?

login or register to post comments

Submitted by tcm614ce on April 19, 2000 - 09:32.

I also found out by accident when I docked my Dell Inspiron 7000 and went into the display setup and saw the dual monitor thingy. The inspiron has a dual-head ATI rage mobility-p card. I love the setup, the only problem is the max resolution on my 21" external is still 1024x768 :-(

login or register to post comments

Submitted by isaac on April 19, 2000 - 10:19.

tcm614ce: I have been considering using a laptop as my primary development machine, but had only heard of the Powerbook being able to do dual displays (but they're too expensive, and can't do what I want in other areas). From what I've heard, the Dell's will only clone. Are you able to double your display? Can each display have an independent resolution? Can the external monitor be set as the primary display? Does the ATI card have 3D capabilities? If so, what is performance like in Quake1-3? Does multiple monitor capability extend across other models and product lines within the Dell notebook range? What resolution will the ATI card manage? I guess I'm not looking forward to an office situation where I'm doubling my hardware - PC for home, PC for office (I currently freelance F/T from home). A dream situation would mean that I'd have a monitor at home, and a monitor at work, and just carry the notebook in between. Could you recommend the Inspiron for a situation like this? Thanks in advance - feel free to email me the details: isaac@triplezero.com.au

login or register to post comments

Submitted by tcm614ce on April 20, 2000 - 15:03.

Yes the ATI card can double the display area. You can have different resolutions and choose your primary monitor. It has 3D capabilities but I haven't done much gaming on it. The best I can say is that the Motocross Madness Demo looks pretty good. There is at least one other Dell laptop model in this office that has the same dual head capabilities. I guess just look for the ATI rage mobility. Max Resolution on my card is 1024x768 on both the internal and external. You can also hook up a TV as your 2nd monitor instead (with the same capabilities) via S-video or an included adapter to rca cable (the adapter degrades quality a lot though). I suppose you could even have the TV and external and on-board and have one cloned and the other separated. I definitely would recommend the Inspiron or other laptop with this ATI card for the purpose you mentioned. The on-board LCD display for the Inspiron is a whole 15" too so that's Good Stuff!

login or register to post comments

Submitted by krr on August 9, 2000 - 01:39.

Currently use Voodoo 3 2k and the viewmate 17in with a pII 333 celeron would another voodoo card and say a 15in monitor do the trick?? appreciate feed back :-) thanx krr

login or register to post comments

Many monitors

Submitted by treefrog on April 20, 2001 - 15:24.

In my experience, adding a second monitor to any PC made in the last, say, two years, and running Win98 or anything newer, is extremely easy. The easy way to get a secondary display is this: Go to Computer Renaissance (for those of you in North America, or any used computer store). You can get a 2-meg PCI video card for around $20 US, or a 4-meg card for around $30. You should also be able to find a 15-inch monitor for around $100 or less. Plug the card into your PC, the monitor into that card, and off you go. a 2 meg card is sufficient for 1024x768 at 16 bit color, which I find acceptable on a secondary 15-inch monitor. A 4 meg card should be able to do 1024x768 at 16-bit.

Caveat: a friend of mine has been recently switched to linux, and reports many headaches getting multiple monitors running with XWindows.

Now, if I can only get ICQ to undock off the side of my primary monitor and get shifted to my secondary...

login or register to post comments

Many Monitors

Submitted by krr on April 20, 2001 - 15:43.

I appreciate the feed back, I hadn't expected an, as I had posted it quite some time ago. The route that I had looked into at the time was extremely expensive. New monitor "21inch" plus the Matrox card at $350. Takes quite a bit out of your hide.

Since the post I have upgraded my system so working with dual monitors would quite a bit cheaper. I could just use one pci card for the extra monitor and a agp card for my primary monitor.

Thank You
Kevin

login or register to post comments

Drawbacks

Submitted by swimfrog on November 13, 2001 - 15:49.

I've been using a dual display configuration for about 2 years now. What Isaac says in the main article about, "Every day at work on a crusty 17" was torture - I'd be dying to get home" is true! I love being able to throw all of my little apps (Winamp, Chat windows, etc) onto my secondary display. I'm currently running 2 17" Dell Trinitron displays on a Matrox G450 32mb Dualhead card. However, it wasn't always like this! I'd like to touch on the drawbacks, just for good measure to give you an idea of what NOT to do :)

I first started out with an NVidia TNT2 AGP card and an S3 Virge/GX PCI, running 2 15" NEC Displays. The obvious drawback was that PCI card. First of all, if you're going to run dual displays, please, spend the little extra money on a Matrox card. It's worth it. The main difficulty I had was that the PCI card was much slower than the AGP, so when you move windows onto the secondary monitor, you get a very choppy, lagged movement. In fact, it was so slow, that Winamp had trouble scrolling the song title!

Secondly. It's worth it to buy two of the exact same monitors at the same time. The problem with running two displays by various manufacturers is that they are capable of different resolutions, colors, refresh rates, etc. Running a 17" and a 15" at 1024x768 would give you a smaller image on the 15" than it would on the 17. This can be confusing if you do anything with Photoshop or any other image editor where image sizes are concerned. Plus, it looks much more impressive!

Once I upgraded to the Matrox card, I was in heaven. The "Clone" feature is excellent for doing those Powerpoint presentations on videotape. However, most people will fail to tell you that, unless you use the Matrox software a certain way, (With your taskbar stretched across both monitors, and desktop icons split across both displays) there are huge drawbacks.

First of all, and most annoying, Windows is incapable of OpenGL when multiple displays are involved (Win98 and Win2k do NOT support it, XP may be able to, I haven't experimented with it). You can, however, do this when the Matrox software is running the show, but if you're using 2 video cards, forget it! Even the Matrox software (It's actually called Powerdesk) has it's drawbacks. For instance, when you want to switch from dual displays to the "Clone" feature, or "DVD-MAX" (Displays a DVD video fullscreen on the secondary display while it's minimized on the primary) you need to reboot to enable the feature, then reboot again after switching back to dual displays. Needless to say, this is a nightmare for those of us who like to reboot once a month :)

Also, certain programs are *still* not compatible with dual displays. ICQ is one of them. I'd love to be able to throw all of my IM programs onto the second display, but unless you stack your monitors on top of each other, that's not an option. Also, my TV card will not function unless I disable the second display altogether. Trust me, it'll crash disastrously, resulting in my having to reinstall the drivers :(

All in all, multiple displays are absolutely wonderful if you do it right the first time. Get the Matrox card, get 2 monitors at the same time (The BIOSes in the monitors may differ if you get them at different stores, or even a week apart from each other) and you'll be one step ahead of the game...

Ben

login or register to post comments

re: re:... ;-)

Submitted by krr on November 13, 2001 - 21:02.

I appreciate your time and the insight.
Went out and took a look at the card you mentioned and It actually looks like it was designed more for the work in question than the card that I had in mind. I was actually looking at the ASUS line of video cards for the dual output using the 32mb DDR memory etc... The Matrox looks like it can do a much better job based on the quick reviews that I did.

Unfortunately I seriously doubt I will be able to set this up in the near future as my next purchase will definately be the new CF Studio upgrade version 5 that bundled the Macromedia Ultra developer with it. Althou I am not sure exactly how much use I will get out of Ultra Dev. I am looking forward to working with the developers edition of the CF SERVER 5 that comes loaded with CF Studio.

insight always appreciated

thank you Kevin

login or register to post comments

More dual monitor fun

Submitted by isaac on November 13, 2001 - 21:15.

I still have my Matrox G400 at home with the 21" and 15", but we have two machines at the office that have both been running happily with the newer Matrox G450 and 19" + 17" ViewSonics since March 2001.

The 3D performance in Quake 3 Arena, RTCW, etc is also pretty decent. For a primary gaming machine, you might look at specialist cards, but for the office where you hope to get at least some work done, I wouldn't go past the Matrox range.

login or register to post comments

re:

Submitted by krr on November 13, 2001 - 21:35.

Sounds good.

When I get there I will have to come back and review these articles.

For now I am buried in the Forta book, CF 5 application construction kit. pretty cool stuff.

thank you kevin

login or register to post comments

Help with designing a 4-monitor system

Submitted by MRBIGGIN on May 26, 2003 - 17:41.

I am interested in creating the ultimate home stock market monitoring system. What I would like to do is create a LCD 4-monitor system. I need 3 displays slanted around my keyboard and another on top of the main screen. The 3 displays around the keyboard should be atleast 19" LCD's and the top can be 15" or 17". Please let me know what brands of monitors I should consider and which video card I will need to run 4 monitors. My system is a pentium 4- 2.7g and I am running Windows XP. Anyones input would be much appreciated.

login or register to post comments

The access keys for this page are: ALT (Control on a Mac) plus:

evolt.orgEvolt.org is an all-volunteer resource for web developers made up of a discussion list, a browser archive, and member-submitted articles. This article is the property of its author, please do not redistribute or use elsewhere without checking with the author.