Skip to page content or skip to Accesskey List.
Search evolt.org
evolt.org login: or register

Work

Main Page Content

Design is not Art

Rated 3.78 (Ratings: 2) (Add your rating)

Log in to add a comment
(9 comments so far)

Want more?

 
Picture of brandon

Brandon Edwards

Member info | Full bio

User since: June 24, 1999

Last login: June 24, 1999

Articles written: 1

Designers are not artists. They can be, but the immediate relation between the two is somewhat opaque. Unfortunately, most people confuse design with art, which does a disservice to both designers and artists.

Art transcends design. It transcends purpose and function. Hell, art can transcend anything. It communicates unto a person. It, until the advent of the Internet, was primarily one-way. As if defining art wasn't self-defeating enough, the whole idea if interactive and digital art makes the definition entirely more difficult. Art reaches into you, pulls out your heart, disturbs you sometimes, frightens you sometimes, occasionally makes you laugh. Simply put, it brings about true emotions.

Design, however, is theoretically limited by purpose and function. It serves to present, but not distract from, the content in a functional and pulling (preferably innovative) way. The question still remains though, to define where content ends and design begins (but that topic is for another day). The "Art" in this industry is the content. Not the layout. Design is the presentation of the content.

I have especially seen many neophytes do this. They get their hands on a graphic program and a WYSIWYG editor and think the rest is easy. And they find themselves going in circles because they are not aware of what they are trying to accomplish. And it is very discouraging to most who think that these skills are computer generated. They are not, and it only makes it harder on the apprentice, and unfortunately it gives the experts something to moan about.

The artist who starts out thinking he/she can translate art into design is facing a rough path. Whether it be web design or print design, the artist can not expect instant 'ability'. Becoming a proficient designer, let alone a skilled one, is a totally different genre of study. After that it can be broken into old and new media. Learning the computer, as it were. User Interaction, etceteras, all make for very nice looking 'layouts'. But art? The reason this is even an issue right now is because of people like me (and those I think much more skilled than I) who already have design experience and are pushing the limits of what art is. That doesn't make it any easier for the novice who wants to 'jump right in'.

If you want to create design that communicates and expresses yourself and make money for it, well, good luck. Most clients aren't in to that; that's why you have a personal site, right? If you want to be creative about it, if you want to make what you call your 'design' your statement, in other words, if you want to design a web page so utterly fabulous it will drive people mad with envy and glory, then fine. You're not designing. You're making art.

Submitted by tin on September 1, 1999 - 18:59.

A thought-provoking article. While I agree design is not Art, good designing is AN art, in the same way that any skill (e.g. programming) is honed to awe-inspiring (usually to those in the same field) perfection.

login or register to post comments

Submitted by kirakar on April 13, 2000 - 02:08.

Designers are communicators. They put their technical and artistics skills to deliver a message a purpose, a project throught a web page, a magazine, an object, etc. Their designs serve a purpose. Some designers are artists because they put their technical and artistic skills to make a piece of art. But in this case there is no purpose, is just the need of a self expression and the compulsion to create. One person can be an artist and a designer, but when is designing is just a designer and when is creating with no goal just for the pleasure or torment to create then is just an artist. I also think that good designing is an art... but is not Art.

login or register to post comments

Submitted by marshallgs on May 3, 2000 - 21:01.

You have a point, but I still think of my self as an artist of sorts. A good site should look nice, it should be artistic. But not as dramatic or profound as a painting. Don't totaly dismiss the artistic side.

login or register to post comments

Close, but not quite...

Submitted by chicken3 on August 20, 2001 - 01:55.

If design is truly only a representation of communication, and not of stylistic or artistic merit, then why are there so many celebrated designers, and many more high profile, award-winning firms that gain clients in part on their work? Yes, most clients could care less about the self expression in your work; but like it or not it's there.

login or register to post comments

Absolutes will always get you into trouble.

Submitted by raymond_pirouz on January 8, 2002 - 20:21.

X is not (or does not equal) Y may work in math, but when you're talking about something as subjective and non-quantifiable as art, are you sure you want to even go there?

Because even in theoretical mathematics and theoretical physics, X can and does actually equal Y beyond the literalist's conceptual ability to comprehend that which does not hit him/her in the face.

Obviously, you have every right to your opinion - which conversely holds true for anyone who happens to disagree - but what would the ultimate point of your discovery be given it were true?

Is it now a crime for designers to see themselves as artists? What possible harm could such behavior pose?

Is Bonsai - or the resulting Bonsai plant - an art, or is it gardening resulting in a plant? Why torture oneself over it? Be happy and enjoy life and all its nuances. No limitation can ever be good.

If we can't quantify quantum physics, how dare we even attempt to quantify something as human, beautiful and personal as art and its relation to design - or design and its relation to art?

login or register to post comments

There are no absolutes on anything.

Submitted by kirakar on January 9, 2002 - 06:32.

I don't think there are absolutes on anything. My post was regarding the article and web design. I basically agree with the article and I still believe that design, web design, is about communication. Some web designers do art, and some of them are called now web artists (like Fischer West among others) in a new form of art called web art. Some designers are exposed in museums, galleries because they've found on the discipline of design the way to do art, the way of self expression. I think that's great and I am sorry if I've sounded absolute.

Denying the basic and theoretical goals of design regarding content and function is a little bit naive (for me). But as everything evolves, culture, society and criteria it will be possible that design will be consider art in the near future, basically, theoretically and absolutely (!?)....

And about daring to quantify, express ideas or opinions on something as human, beautiful and personal as art... Well, my guess is that is because we are human, beautiful and personal ( all of us) :-).

login or register to post comments

Art is defined by the artist

Submitted by printelectric on January 7, 2005 - 07:09.

For better or for worse, art is defined by the artist. If you say 'this is art'... then it is. One has only to look at modern abstract art for an unlimited number of examples of this. Having said that, the best designers, the ones who really drive the industry, are artists. This does not make design art. Design has, and always should have, different goals. Those goals often overlap - for instance it is a benefit to both an artist and a designer if their work elicits an emotional response in the viewer. But the goal of professional design is to communicate the benefits of a product or service to a consumer. The goal of art depends entirely on the artist. It may have a political agenda, may seek to communicate something, or may be created simply because the artist wanted it to exist. This does not mean that designers can't seek to create great work that is emotionally moving and beautiful, but it does mean that they should start with a clearly defined set of communication goals, and should strive to achieve those goals, which may or may not detract from the artistic merits of the finished work.

login or register to post comments

Art is about creating things

Submitted by ceej2005 on October 29, 2008 - 11:34.

Art is about creating things to communicate while design is about creating things to solve problems. The two are similar but they are different. Sometimes design might use communication to solve a problem (a logo), sometimes it won't (a door handle).

login or register to post comments

We all agree that art is an

Submitted by eepoy on November 7, 2008 - 10:23.

We all agree that art is an application of human creative skill. We all agree that graphic design involves an application of human creative skill. Then we should all agree that graphic design involves art. Why can’t we do that with design and art? Harmony is good!

login or register to post comments

The access keys for this page are: ALT (Control on a Mac) plus:

evolt.orgEvolt.org is an all-volunteer resource for web developers made up of a discussion list, a browser archive, and member-submitted articles. This article is the property of its author, please do not redistribute or use elsewhere without checking with the author.