Skip to page content or skip to Accesskey List.
Search evolt.org
evolt.org login: or register

Work

Main Page Content

Governing Good Web Site Design

Rated 3.36 (Ratings: 10) (Add your rating)

Log in to add a comment
(8 comments so far)

Want more?

 
Picture of ideahamster

troy janisch

Member info | Full bio

User since: July 08, 2002

Last login: September 07, 2005

Articles written: 15

Frustration is a common experience among marketers trying to judge the quality of a web site design. Everyone wants to implement the best-looking web site, but opinions of what constitutes a great site vary.

Fortunately, what constitues a good web site isn't based on opinion. It is based upon evidence.

Although the 'look and feel' of many well-conceived web sites may vary greatly, good web sites tend to share a number of characteristics. These characteristics provide the basis of the "Research-Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines" developed by the Federal Government as part of its usability.gov initiative.

Research-Based Web Design and Usability GuidelinesResearch-Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines — http://www.usability.gov

The Guidelines provide marketers with a good overview and deep understanding of the wide range of Web design issues that they may encounter while managing a web site. The Guidelines provide marketers with standards that can be used to judge web designs. Marketers can request that the web designers and developers they work with follow relevant portions of the Guidelines and can use the Guidelines to set priorities.

Sanjay J. Koyani, a senior usability specialist for the HHS Web Management Team, said the government currently offers 187 research-based guidelines and plans to add nearly 50 more guidelines in 2004.

While the number of guidelines can seem daunting, usability.gov provides a tool developed in cooperation with AARP that allows site visitors to sort guidelines based on their overall relevance and the amount of supporting evidence. This means its possible to identify and focus on the most important guidelines for success.

For example, the four guidelines that score highest in both relevance and supporting evidence include:

  • Use an Iterative Design Approach

    Designs should be tested with site visitors before they are implemented. Use paper prototypes to test the design and make revisions to the design based on your findings.
  • Provide Useful Content

    While it seems common sense. It's not uncommon for sites to contain a company's sales pitch instead of the information that site visitors are looking for. Studies have reported that content is more important than navigation, visual design, functionality, and interactivity.
  • Ensure Visual Consistency

    Design creativity must be balanced with consistency. Studies show that tasks performed on more consistent interfaces resulted in: reduced task completion times; fewer errors; higher user satisfaction; and a shorter learning time.
  • Use Black Text on Plain, High-Contrast Backgrounds

    Use white text on dark backgrounds sparingly. People read black text on a white background up to 32 percent faster.

As of September, 2004, the Guidelines will also be available in HTML instead of as a series of PDF-based files. The site will also offer subscriptions to a new monthly newsletter focusing on web design and usability research/finding.

"We want to raise the bar in what people expect from their own web site," said Janice Nall, manager of the Usability Solutions Group in the Office of Electronic Government and Technology for General Services Administration (GSA). "The guidelines provide project managers with the criteria and expectations they need to make design decisions based on the facts."

"When you make good design decisions early, you prevent a lot of potential problems."

Troy Janisch is president and founder of Icon Interactive™, an industry leader helping companies integrate Internet and other Interactive media into sales channels, marketing strategies, and overall branding. He can be contacted by email at tjanisch@iconinteractive.com.

Useful -- glad I read it

Submitted by ThomH on February 11, 2005 - 07:41.

This article almost falls into the News or Usability category rather than Visual Design. It basically just summarizes a single a source, and then offers some very general conclusions. Of course, that's often exactly what a busy business person needs: a good overview, without any distortion, and then the bottomline. The lengthy orignal source gets read later if at all. So I think this article succeeds very well for what it does. What I would like to se eventually: some sort of comparision and contrast among all these usability studies, from the Gov to Jakob to Joe Clark. That aside, again, a forceful and useful reminder of the basics--with the research and experience to bear it out.

login or register to post comments

This document alone is worth it's weight in taxes.

Submitted by neoliminal on October 19, 2005 - 20:37.

PDF

login or register to post comments

"Designs should be tested

Submitted by smaaz on March 14, 2007 - 18:53.

"Designs should be tested with site visitors before they are implemented. Use paper prototypes to test the design and make revisions to the design based on your findings." The problem here is, the more people I ask, the more different opinions I get - and since most opinions are subjectively, they are worthless. Thats why I have stopped asking people to review my designs / sites. Regards Smaaz

login or register to post comments

Great article...

Submitted by Heironymous on March 18, 2007 - 20:11.

I agree that good site design can be very subjective, but putting plenty of thought into how your site will flow and usability issues beforehand will save you plenty of work once the site goes live. It's often difficult to analyze usability issues after a site is up unless visitors actually report them to you, which is rare.--Andrew New York City Photography

login or register to post comments

I completely agree. We have

Submitted by cianuro on March 19, 2007 - 01:56.

I completely agree. We have actually stopped taking on "regular" design clients as a result of the hassle that comes from not being able to accurately measure a clients "Subjective tastes". If a client commissions you to do a design, there could be a hundred versions they do not like before finding something to "their" tastes. Running a subjective business model has very little accountability. Dave

login or register to post comments

A problem

Submitted by t4tw on June 29, 2007 - 00:39.

An interesting article! It’s opened my eyes to the aspects I never thought of. I am building an information site www.t4tw.info but except for the relatively good content that is periodically added, I have little idea on how the site should look like visually to become more appealing to visitors and to make them have more positive feeling about it. This site is associated with web standards and education. If you happen to have any ideas I would greatly appreciate it if you let me know. My email: sebastian(dot)snopek(at)yahoo(dot)ca Thanks a lot!

login or register to post comments

good points

Submitted by ryanu on April 20, 2008 - 02:03.

I think the use black text on high contrast background is the most important. Anyone have any numbers for which fonts are read the fastest? Might be interesting. At my Arizona Web Site Design Company we tend to use arial and georgia frequently. I wonder if this serves our customers best though.

login or register to post comments

I agree that good site

Submitted by Daniel Saltman on December 19, 2008 - 02:03.

Yes I agree that good site design can be very subjective, but putting plenty of thought into how your site will flow and usability issues beforehand will save you plenty of work once the site goes live. It's often difficult to analyze usability issues after a site is up unless visitors actually report them to you, which is rare. -Daniel Saltman

login or register to post comments

The access keys for this page are: ALT (Control on a Mac) plus:

evolt.orgEvolt.org is an all-volunteer resource for web developers made up of a discussion list, a browser archive, and member-submitted articles. This article is the property of its author, please do not redistribute or use elsewhere without checking with the author.