Skip to page content or skip to Accesskey List.
Search evolt.org
evolt.org login: or register

Work

Main Page Content

Two Spaces After a Period Isn't Dead Yet

Rated 3.71 (Ratings: 4) (Add your rating)

Log in to add a comment
(13 comments so far)

Want more?

 
Picture of aardvark

Adrian Roselli

Member info | Full bio

User since: December 13, 1998

Last login: September 01, 2006

Articles written: 48

...At least not in my world.

After years of doing it correctly, I have gone and purposely done it wrong over and over again.  I know what is considered right (no double space) and what is considered wrong (double space), but after years of doing graphic design, I no longer follow that rule so closely.  I have two exceptions I personally follow, and nobody has ever noticed until I point it out to them (and then they chastise me for not knowing the 'correct way').   I know that professional typesetters use 1 space, and I know that typing teachers taught 2 spaces, and I know why.  In professional printing, you have what are generally well-designed typefaces with professionally tweaked kerning that shouldn't need the extra space.  For the old-fashioned typewriter, however, the text was in a fixed-width typeface (kinda like Courier) that did not aid the user in his or her reading of the text.  This drove the need to insert that extra space as a clue that the end of a sentence was coming (since people often see ahead of where they are reading, such cues are important).

For instance, in multimedia (which includes web design), your screen fonts are often not well represented in pixels and many characters butt up against one another while others space out further.  Kerning just doesn't seem to take care of that very well, as you can see in Word documents (or the occasional web site) that have been justified.  Since here we tend to lose the advantages afforded good typefaces in print, namely proper kerning and clean representation of the fonts within the small amount of pixels allowed, we lose our reasons for abandoning the double space.  In these cases, I add an extra space after a period to improve readability.

When using free fonts (from great sites like Chank), often the characters aren't properly spaced, and they need some help from the designer.  Again, sometimes you don't want to kern the entire document; you just want more space because the font designer made his period have no space on the right.  In this case, I will use a double space.  I have found that in print, most designers tend to not notice this until I point it out.

I used to follow the rule precisely, but after years of looking at my stuff and being disappointed at legibility, I made the conscious decision to abandon or modify that rule in certain cases.  Rules are made to be broken, aren't they?

I was reading an article from Scientific American while riding on the tube the other day, and I ran across the following block of text:

"...to determine whether they were commercially viable in the U.S. Ware and his colleagues concluded that the green and the brown cotton yielded too little..."

When I first read it, it took me a few times of re-reading to recognize that Ware is a person's name (as explained earlier in the article, I just forgot since I am bad with names), and not some government agency (US Ware?).  The single space in this case, coupled with the justification of the article (removing the consistency of spaces between words from line to line) confused the heck out of me.

I found myself wishing they had an intern who incorrectly added another space after years of being traumatized by an unruly typing teacher in high school, because then I wouldn't have been so confused.

A founder of evolt.org, Adrian Roselli (aardvark) is the Senior Usability Engineer at Algonquin Studios, located in Buffalo, New York.

Adrian has years of experience in graphic design, web design and multimedia design, as well as extensive experience in internet commerce and interface design and usability. He has been developing for the World Wide Web since its inception, and working the design field since 1993. Adrian is a founding member, board member, and writer to evolt.org. In addition, Adrian sits on the Digital Media Advisory Committee for a local SUNY college and a local private college, as well as the board for a local charter school.

You can see his personal portfolio at http://roselli.org/.

Adrian authored the usability case study for evolt.org in Usability: The Site Speaks for Itself, published by glasshaus. He has written three chapters for the book Professional Web Graphics for Non Designers, also published by glasshaus. Adrian also managed to get a couple chapters written (and published) for The Web Professional's Handbook before glasshaus went under. They were really quite good. You should have bought more of the books.

While you're reading, a friend of mine has just launched her site, and you should take a look. Kristen Kos, a lovely and talented actress, now has her own site with her acting resume and some new head shots.

Did anybody ever read this?

Submitted by aardvark on March 2, 2001 - 00:30.

I feel bad seeing an article with no comments, whether or not it deserved any. So, I might as well add one, and a useful one at that. Another decent article on the spacing issue, written around the same time as this one, is One Versus Two Spaces After a Period, over at webword.com. Clearly they didn't this article good enough to link, but I didn't even see theirs until a while ago, and it's taken me forever to post it. So, how often do you carry on conversations with yourself?

login or register to post comments

Nice post

Submitted by biz on May 17, 2001 - 15:48.

I found your article while searching for evidence that two spaces after a period are wrong so I could tell my friends to stop doing it. You make some good points though. I see how in some cases two spaces might help. But overall, two spaces bug me.

login or register to post comments

Old-fashioned

Submitted by monelle on July 20, 2001 - 20:24.

I was asked as a mother-in-law (ugh) to settle the argument: 1 or 2 spaces. I'm 54 years old and learned 2 in Typing class in high school. I've always been interested in language, printing and aesthetics, and I definitely prefer 2 spaces. However, it must just be an old habit, because I just picked up a book and saw to my amazement that the spaces are the same after commas and periods! How can it be, I ask myself, that I never noticed this before, even though I conscientiously add another space after every period in the e-mails I forward? Reading your article seems to indicate that the answer is "kerning," whatever that is (I just looked it up at http://www.meriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary and it's not there). Anyway, thanks much for your very thoughtful article.

login or register to post comments

Kerning links

Submitted by aardvark on July 22, 2001 - 10:45.

Here are some links on kerning:

login or register to post comments

Finally, someone agrees with me.

Submitted by DanTimis on May 26, 2002 - 01:30.

I found this article while searching for arguments for using two spaces after a period at the end of a sentence in email messages.   I got into an argument about this issue on a mailing list.

I use one space with a word processor where I have control over the font in use.   With email, or with postings like this one, you never know what font will be used, so I prefer to err on the side of caution and use two periods.

Thank you.

Dan

login or register to post comments

Damn the developers!

Submitted by lizard on January 7, 2003 - 10:07.

At last, a Web professional willing to concede that the extra nbsp is worth the effort.  Reading online is hard enough without endings that are difficult to observe.  Many Web styles were initially codified by a select few who wrote enormously popular books on Web development, but that does not mean what they deemed appropriate is best.

login or register to post comments

double spaces between sentences

Submitted by EugeneRWalker on March 10, 2003 - 19:26.

I have tracked the debate over one versus two spaces between sentences, but the decisive issues have not been raised until now. Web developers and office correspondents root for one space; "diehard" typing teachers, say, still insist on two. This depends on just what one is doing. For manuscript submission, the correct answer is still TWO--period, double space. In finished productions (business letters, Web pages, magazine articles, books) the double space does indeed go away, BUT ONLY WHEN THE TYPESETTER OR FINAL EDITOR KILLS IT. This criterion is grounded in history, which has not been mentioned adequately in the online debate. The double line-spacing in manuscripts allows the editor(s) to add marks and notes. The double letter-spacing between sentences helps the typesetter's eyes to look from the manuscript to the typset work, then find the place again in the manuscript. The typesetter, however, never carries the double space over to the finished product. If you, as an author, would like the typesetter to dribble a few of your sentences onto the floor--or duplicate them, making you look like an idiot--by all means feel free to ignore this fact. The editor who accepts or favors single spaces can do just like the typesetter--mentally omit the second space from paper copy, or with a few keystrokes turn all the doubles into singles in electronic copy. BUT YOU CAN'T GO THE OTHER WAY. If the writer or an earlier-than-final editor deletes the second spaces, and then a later editor or typesetter wants the double spaces, somebody has to go through the whole piece sentence by sentence to fix it. This is the perfect fate for the nitwit who doesn't know what the rule is, let alone why.

login or register to post comments

I'm for using two spaces

Submitted by jleblanc on March 11, 2005 - 13:13.

Adding two spaces after a sentence is just as important as determining how paragraphs are separated.  Just imagine if we didn't do hard breaks or add spacing between two paragraphs:

Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  
Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine.  Just imagine. Just imagine. Just imagine.  

It looks jumbled and sloppy and reading an entire page like that would really annoy me!  At face value, the kerning explanation may seem a valid reason for the extinction of two spaces, but it is a moot point.  If you apply Human Factors principles (which are way more important than kerning) then two spaces is still very necessary.  The reason I state this is because, if you are a writer by trade, your first responsibility is to keep your audience in mind.  Over the last fifteen years, my audience has always comprised of engineers and/or executives that read hundreds of pages every week.  If they have to think about whether or not it is U.S. Ware or U.S. then Ware, they are going to get frustrated and I will eventually lose my job.  To me, it is not a burden to type two spaces after each sentence, it is a requirement.

login or register to post comments

Well, all they actually need

Submitted by GabiO on June 28, 2006 - 19:27.

Well, all they actually need is a good editor. All style manuals I can think of recommend that U.S. be spelled out (United States) when used as a noun. The abbreviated version (U.S.) is used only as an adjective (the U.S. economy). Don't you think that people should learn to write and edit better rather than rely on mechanical means such as double space to convey their thoughts clearly?

login or register to post comments

Your comparison of the

Submitted by GabiO on June 28, 2006 - 19:46.

Your comparison of the double space with the paragraph space isn't quite right. The paragraph space is necessary only if you do not indent the first paragraph line. So the graphic example you provide actually corresponds to no space between sentences. The equivalent of the double space would be a paragraph space *plus* indentation of the first line, and that's clearly unacceptable. If you are a writer by trade you should easily be able to avoid no brainers such as U.S. Wane. I also believe that plain and proper English helps our audience better than double spacing.

login or register to post comments

adding two spaces in HTML

Submitted by Biddy on November 4, 2007 - 16:22.

I notice that you're adding two nbsp characters after each period to get a double space since HTML ignores more than one space character. In HTML it makes more sense to use nbsp followed by a regular space. That way the source code can break after a period, instead of forcing the last word of the sentence down to the next line with the first word of the next sentence. Unfortunately, programs like OpenOffice swap the order and stick the nbsp to the front of the next sentence, rather than to the preceding period which caused the need for spaces in the first place. Oh, and it seems to me that whether to put one or two spaces should include this information: Is the text justified or left-aligned? It matters more which you choose when the text is justified. Does the author prefer the added space for an extra visual clue? This matters, too.

login or register to post comments

3 spaces after a period should be dead

Submitted by Gary Lutchansky on January 24, 2008 - 22:14.

Thank you for this post. It's good to learn about other people's viewpoints. Back in the early years of computing, I switched from repeatedly batting the space key. It's easier to hit it only once. And it has become a standard.

Letting two spaces after the period die is the way to go. Why? Well, you have to fight to maintain it. It's not worth the effort. Further, two spaces has become nonstandard. Reading your well-written post bothers me slightly because of the "extra" spacing. It looks different than what I read EVERYWHERE else. The comment from Biddy noticed your insertion of 2 nbsp characters to get around the HMTL limitation where extra spaces are ignored. Too much work! Plus, in the effort to maintain 2 spaces yet another space gets added. For example, consider the first real paragraph of this article before "I know that professional typesetters..." Three spaces is too much!

The "...U.S. Ware..." example that removes the start of one sentence and the end of another to highlight the confusion of single spaces after a period doesn't move me. Those who view this example positively--including you--don't show us how it should look with the two-spaces approach. Fact is, it doesn't look much different; there is a chance for confusion either way. Readers can be forgiving when confusion doesn't strike at every period. Or, as other comments suggest, the sentences could be changed.

login or register to post comments

Can't agree

Submitted by jopejope on February 25, 2008 - 03:32.

You make a few interesting points, but I don't think that extra little sliver of space is needed, even in a few of the situations you specify. People's eyes (brains) adjust. Just let go, I say. We can all spot the end of a sentence just fine without a massive chasm of blank to telegraph it.

Also, I can't bring myself to agree with you on the Scientific American example. It just sounds like you're desperately trying to defend an outdated practice that you feel some familiarity with. It is perfectly clear from the context and wording that the sentence does not end there. Also, since the phrase up to "in the U.S." is introductory, a comma is warranted after it. This would make things much clearer. You could find phrases like "the U.S. Treaty on . . . " But even that's clear from the wording.

login or register to post comments

The access keys for this page are: ALT (Control on a Mac) plus:

evolt.orgEvolt.org is an all-volunteer resource for web developers made up of a discussion list, a browser archive, and member-submitted articles. This article is the property of its author, please do not redistribute or use elsewhere without checking with the author.