Skip to page content or skip to Accesskey List.
Search evolt.org
evolt.org login: or register

Work

Main Page Content

Google Gets the Most Traffic

Rated 3.79 (Ratings: 7) (Add your rating)

Log in to add a comment
(6 comments so far)

Want more?

 
Picture of 4serendipity

Andrew Stevens

Member info | Full bio

User since: March 22, 2001

Last login: October 21, 2008

Articles written: 3

A recent Search Engine Report article reports that Jupiter Media Metrix and Nielsen//NetRatings have developed new means to determine the popularity of search engines. These new ratings indicate that Google is clearly the most frequently used search engine.

"Search Hours"

These new ratings are based on a new measure "Search Hours," which not only looks at the number of people visiting a site but also the average amount of time each visitor spends there. This differs from the more traditional means to ranks search sites' popularity, such as "audience reach," which records the percentage of the Internet audience that visits a site in a given month, without taking note of the number of times that each visitor spends at a site or the number of searches that they perform while they are there.

These new rankings make it clear that your ranking in Google is more important than ever.

Making your site Google-friendly

Fortunately there is a large amount of information available to help insure that your site will be indexed and well-ranked by Google.

Some good starting points are:

Andrew Stevens has been doing web work for some time now.

Andrew is originally from a place called Dublin, Ohio and currently resides in a place called Fairfax, Virginia.

which search engine is the best?

Submitted by r937 on June 8, 2002 - 12:15.

which search engine is the best, according to the seach engines? jason kottke does a little experiment -- http://www.kottke.org/

login or register to post comments

Search hours does not mean much

Submitted by carlbeeth on June 8, 2002 - 15:18.

It would be much more interesting to know the number of queries. finding something on Google vs. another search engine usually takes far less time. So my hunch is that Google is even more popular than indicated by the study.

login or register to post comments

One more metric

Submitted by 4serendipity on June 11, 2002 - 17:40.

One more metric mentioned in the Search Engine Watch article is "search referrals," which refers to the amount of traffic each engine sends to sites.

A StatMarket report places Google (32 percent of the referrals) just behind Yahoo (which accounted for 36 percent of the referrals).

A OneStat report placed Google in the lead with 47 percent of the referrals (although Danny Sullivan questions the accuracy of this report).

login or register to post comments

update on the Kottke link

Submitted by mkelley on June 19, 2002 - 15:53.

The link has disappeared into Jason's archive, but the permalink is here http://www.kottke.org/02/06/020606the_top_10_s.html

login or register to post comments

Google vs. Yahoo

Submitted by ZillaLinkDirectory on September 4, 2006 - 15:48.

I think it is obvious that Google is number one. I have several sites that are relatively successful on google but not nearly as good on Yahoo results. I have done some optimizing for them both but the difference in hits is a very big gap. My conclusion is that Yahoo puts alot of emphasis on the age of the sites as all of my sites are under 2 years old.

login or register to post comments

According to google..

Submitted by Jos on September 6, 2006 - 10:11.

According to google, after searching for "Which search engine is the best?", dogpile takes the lead!

Which actually makes at least some sense, if you look at the service. I don't have any experience with it though..

login or register to post comments

The access keys for this page are: ALT (Control on a Mac) plus:

evolt.orgEvolt.org is an all-volunteer resource for web developers made up of a discussion list, a browser archive, and member-submitted articles. This article is the property of its author, please do not redistribute or use elsewhere without checking with the author.