Skip to page content or skip to Accesskey List.
Search evolt.org
evolt.org login: or register

Work

Main Page Content

The Good, Bad and Downright Ugly of Flash Email

Rated 3.9 (Ratings: 10) (Add your rating)

Log in to add a comment
(23 comments so far)

Want more?

 
Picture of FDG_Tom

Tom Granger

Member info | Full bio

User since: June 22, 2001

Last login: June 22, 2001

Articles written: 2

Lately there has been a great deal of interest in adding Flash to your everyday run-of-the-mill email so you can send it to your clients, prospects or newsletter subscribers. Marketing has descended from upon high and declared it, the small business client wants it, or an executive in management has read about it.

Well, why not?

The fact of the matter is that email HTML browsers are just not equal to their web browser equivalents. This is further made complex by the wide variety of settings, preferences, security updates, versions, and third-party applications which make the user experience hard to predict.

This is an interesting problem to contend with when creating, designing and marketing your HTML email. Most likely you are about to hate what I am about to say, however, please do not shoot the messenger.

You should never use Flash or any other rich media piece in your HTML email unless you absolutely know that the email client your recipient uses can handle Flash content. Further, you should only send Flash/rich media content to someone who has requested it, or you have an agreed upon marketing relationship. The first time that I had to wait almost an hour to download what turned out to be a Flash email, I was on a hotel dial up account. That one Flash email cost nearly $10.00 and an hour of my time.

Not exactly the relationship you want to enter into with your customers or clients.

So if you absolutely have to send Flash content via email, here are a few tips you should remember.

Do not try to control your Flash with active scripting

Due to the wide variety of email clients, browsers, security settings, updates, and service packs installed, it is difficult to predict how a script will execute against any given email client. JavaScripts can cause browsers & Outlook 2000 to disable any active scripting contained in an email document (there has been an increase in email security due to malicious scripts).

You're better off attaching or sending a link

The majority of web-based email clients (Hotmail, Yahoo!, etc.) will strip out your Flash content. It is not uncommon to send embedded Flash content only to have the recipient open it in their web-based client and see absolutely nothing.

You also cannot rely on a <NOEMBED> to provide an alternate link for the content. You will need to include a text link before or after your Flash content for all Web-based recipients and those whose systems, ISP, network security, or other variables interfere with their viewing of Flash content.

By sending your Flash content as an attachment or a link, you can work around some of these limitations imposed by making the Flash content render in the browser rather in your email. That way, if your recipient has the plugin, they can view the Flash file.

Make sure your files do not immediately start playing

Control your content with an onClick, or other event. Just a nice "Click here for an important message." is all you need. Allow the viewer to start the presentation when they are ready. A Flash or Shockwave piece, which begins streaming if viewed in an Outlook preview window, will start a second time when the email is opened. This will usually cause quite a mess with the recipient's sound system, not to mention distort your intended message.

Nothing will get your Flash email deleted quicker than if it causes unexpected sounds to suddenly come pouring loudly from the recipient's computer during the workday.

These are just a few things you should watch out for if you plan to design, send and expect responses to your Flash emails.

Flash & other rich media may all be year 2001 — "bleeding edge" for the world of web browsers. Unfortunately your average HTML email browser seems stuck at about early 1998.

Additional Resources

What the hell are you talking about

Submitted by Martin Tsachev on August 18, 2002 - 16:29.

Sorry Tom, I just couldn't read it after half of the first sentence, but this is definitely something that you need to avoid if sending me mail.

login or register to post comments

Hmmm....

Submitted by FDG_Tom on August 18, 2002 - 17:15.

Funny that you didn't actually read past the first sentence before posting a negative rating or review. In a grumpy mood are we?

login or register to post comments

Sorry about that

Submitted by Martin Tsachev on August 18, 2002 - 17:29.

I don't really think Flash has anything to do with mail. Mail is mail, it is best for it to be plain text.

login or register to post comments

In a perfect world..

Submitted by kenkogler on August 18, 2002 - 20:56.

I agree that mail should be plain text, but I highly doubt that marketers will...

After all, you can't embed scripting or hidden images to track users if you're sending as text... Like it or not, HTML e-mail is here to stay, and it would be nice if everyone out there adhered to the guidelines in this article and just used a bit of common sense, too...

login or register to post comments

Plain text rules

Submitted by Martin Tsachev on August 20, 2002 - 07:56.

Well Tom, I've read your article and updated the rating ;-).

I just can't stand HTML email and you were suddenly talking about Flash - first impression sometimes misleads you.

login or register to post comments

I Hate Flash Anywhere

Submitted by froggy on August 23, 2002 - 17:25.

I generally abandon websites with Flash, and have no tolerance for e-mail that contains anything other than text. I do use URLs that arrive in e-mail. Anyone who wants to deal with me, or with anyone else who uses dial-up had better realize that extra info on e-mail is unacceptable. It is quite bad enough with web pages.

login or register to post comments

Flash in Context

Submitted by TonyHaddon on August 30, 2002 - 08:29.

I've worked on a couple of promotional HTML E-mails for Yahoo! Delivers. They do have some very stringent requirements and a great deal of limitations in place with regard to what you can do with it. No body background colour, no css, it's all pretty nasty. A worthwhile article to be read before anyone goes and does one of these things. I wish I had.

login or register to post comments

Flash Mails. They're coming

Submitted by lurkazoid on September 5, 2002 - 08:09.

I poroduced some Flash mails (and multi media java mails) for the marketing company I used to work for as an experiment. Depending on the technology you use, you can degrade the mail according to bandwidth and plugins eg Flash to animated gif to gif (or even upscale to WMP or Real). Everything was streamed, so there wasn't an onerous download. I actually got it to run on a 56kbps dialup, though admittedly on a digital exchange running at 50kbps - I could never get it to work on my shonky home connection at 42kbps - with video anyway. Fact is, you're going to be seeing them soon, and all the points made baove are just common sense for permission based marketing of any kind. Why, I remember this debate about usig rich text...

login or register to post comments

Flash Mails. They're getting deleted!

Submitted by electro on September 6, 2002 - 06:18.

No no no no no. Just don't bother. Plain text emails are enough. I find most HTML emails to be useless. As has been pointed out, a link to a webpage presenting the flash is enough. Clog my inbox and get ready to be hated! I scan all my emails BEFORE I download, any advertising trash, viri, and bloted atachments that I don't want get bounced, deleted and the sender gets added to my ignore list. This is the same c24p as the new picture text mobile phones, fun the 1st time, then utterly useless and anoying. I wonder what the real use for them is? Marketing!!!

login or register to post comments

I hate anything, everywhere me.

Submitted by Pickles on December 12, 2002 - 05:13.

It makes me look intelligent. Flash hatred is so pre-5, its boring. Properly built Flash sites can be made to load up in your browser faster than HTML + BMP pages these days and still provide a wealthier user experience so to ignore Flash sites outright is just nonsense. I'm in complete agreement with this article however, the most efficient way of making a FlashMail is to simply email out a link to the Flash site. This has many other added benefits such as server-side support of your e-card for feedback purposes etc. and makes it a lot quicker for you (or the client you are designing for) to bulk-mail all the intended recipients. Personally, I'm not a fan of any 'junk' mail but like electro said, the real use for most commercial Flash work is Marketing and marketing is something that is going to be around as long as companies (including Macromedia, Microsoft, Apple Macintosh, IBM, AOL, and hell, even this site) exist. Personally, I like to be treated with a certain level of intelligence by the companies I spend money with (as is the case with the British market in general as evidenced by the overall quality of advertising in this country compared to...others) and so I am willing to link-out to CLEVER or FULFILLING Flash experiences. I am not, however, impressed by fast moving text with corny motion effects or bright flashing colours (does anybody get the impression I might not be too much fun at christmas?). On the other end of the scale, WOW SPECIAL OFFER text based emails don't really rock my boat either. The long and the short of it surely is if your going to do something, do it properly.

login or register to post comments

Sounds like going from horse and buggy to auto's

Submitted by techprofessor on December 21, 2002 - 00:31.

I happen to agree, I delete most flash email. But the technology is improving and the download times are greatly deminishing. I have also been contacted to develop a automated email system that uses templates and flash. As I looked into the viability of the contract I found a huge marketing advantage when using flash email vs. text email. It just depends on what you are trying to accomplish: market, inform, or just normal communication. I think that you will see a big increase in flash email in the next year.

login or register to post comments

What a load of rubbish!

Submitted by electro on December 21, 2002 - 03:37.

techprofessor wrote: "technology is improving and the download times are greatly deminishing"

Uh, you mean like, people are paying to use cable? Thats the only thing that makes the connection faster. This isn't 'technology improving', this is just the network getting faster IN SOME AREAS!

techprofessor wrote "I have also been contacted to develop a automated email system that uses templates and flash"

Uh, so you are a professional SPAMMER then :-/

techprofessor wrote "I found a huge marketing advantage when using flash email vs. text email. It just depends on what you are trying to accomplish: market, inform, or just normal communication. I think that you will see a big increase in flash email in the next year"

Oh yeh? Well I think youll find an increse in bounced email. If anyone has a problem with this idiot and his kind sending junk mail that takes ages to download, please get yourself MailWasher and you too can bounce this suckers email right back at him, without even downloading it!

Cheers, and happy xmas

login or register to post comments

electro need a pill

Submitted by techprofessor on December 21, 2002 - 13:27.

Wow, talk about issues...

"the only thing that makes the connection faster". You obviously have not read the technical specifications regarding packet traffic in general. IPv6 has additional parameters which synchronize sound and display. Look at Citrix and its capability to send data over smaller and smaller bandwidths - never mind, I don't even know if you are intelligent enough to understand the actual delivery systems.

"Uh, so you are a professional SPAMMER then :-/" You know what happens when you assume... well, you proved it. The mail system was for a firm marketing to an opt-in list - do you know what that means?

"If anyone has a problem with this idiot " I would openly and publicly welcome an exchange of technical knowledge on what ever subject you wish to start.

One last thing,
"happy xmas" - you took Christ out... perhaps you need to put him back in and mellow out.

login or register to post comments

I stand by all my comments

Submitted by electro on December 21, 2002 - 14:04.

I stand by all my comments, you are wrong!

"I don't even know if you are intelligent enough to understand the actual delivery systems."

oh right, so we are going to see a magical 400% or so increse in available bandwidth through this technology for people with 56k dial up modems?

You know what happens when you assume... well, you proved it. The mail system was for a firm marketing to an opt-in list - do you know what that means?"

hahaha, yeh, it means you are a SPAMMER! D'OH!

"I would openly and publicly welcome an exchange of technical knowledge on what ever subject you wish to start."

great, yeh, that would prove you aren't a low life spammer! LOL. Can we not just have dual at dawn? Oh, go on, please!

"One last thing, "happy xmas" - you took Christ out... perhaps you need to put him back in and mellow out."

Hmm, I use that because I am not a Christian, you are really ignorant to even bring this point up. Please keep your religon to yourself, this is a site discussing web development

login or register to post comments

EVERYBODY JUST CALM DOWN

Submitted by jamminman on March 25, 2003 - 09:38.

My God... I was reading this article as I have had some trouble with a flash email I sent out recently. Before I get hate mail, it was an opt-in list for a professional l User Group conference and served as a front -end invitation to our registration site. I think Techprofessor and electro need to take the discussion elsewhere, it's getting silly. I totally agree with pickles and the good prof, however. the basic gist of the situation is this: IMPROPERLY-built flash pieces (whether email OR web sites) and IMPROPERLY-BUILT HTML for that matter are annoying and unhelpful. However, Properly-constructed Flash is, almost ALWAYS FASTER than HTML and scripting for downloads and can be carefully made to degrade for different connections/email browsers/browsers. For that matter, it's even simpler to extend your email header for those who WNAT to read text-only email so that your email can appear in that format and still be useful. Marketing is a necessity, and I find it hard to believe that those who HATE HTML-formatted or Flash-embedded email aren't drawn to anything that has been designed to look good.... you still buy only generic-brand groceries and only things that come in plain brown wrappers, correct? I agree with the hatred for intrusive, pop-up-laden, tricky, lying badly-designed HTML or Flash email and web sites... but I also hate bad local commercials and love well-done Super Bowl commercials.... makes sense, eh? Unfortunately we can't police everyone to make sure only those who do it RIGHT are allowed to do it at all... but writing off EVERYTHING because some amateurs can't raise the bar makes little sense.

login or register to post comments

some stuff

Submitted by armlesspete on May 20, 2003 - 06:04.

Personally i think people with 56k are becoming a minority, and however hard this is to accept, they are going to have to put up with more and more of the companies they deal with, out-growing them technology wise.

Are these 56k users going to start boycotting the internet as more and more flash sites open??

OPT-IN means you physically chose (or got tricked) to submit your address to a particular company...In these days of broadband taking control, marketers need to get up to date with the latest shit.

If you OPT-IN to any campaign, then you should be willing to recieve mail you don't really want...that's what the UNSUBSCRIBE button is for, there are regulations now to prevent (or try to) REAL spammers, and (REAL) marketers have to abide by these rules.

I know its annoying to get spammed a load of bandwidth eating bullshit, but if you've agreed to recieve mail from an UP TO DATE company, then you shouldn't start bitching when they send you UP TO DATE media!

login or register to post comments

Ignorance is bliss...

Submitted by electro on May 20, 2003 - 08:01.

armlesspete - 56k users in the minority? HAHAHAHA get your damn facts straight. Last I looked, it was 20% broadband, 80% dial up worldwide. Boycotting the net? No, just avoiding bloated, useless, style driven bullshit. "If you OPT-IN to any campaign, then you should be willing to recieve mail you don't really want" eh? what? "that's what the UNSUBSCRIBE button is for, there are regulations now to prevent (or try to) REAL spammers, and (REAL) marketers have to abide by these rules." HAHAHAHAH man, that is the best joke I have heard all week. Are you really paying attention here? Please come back down to earth and get with reality.

login or register to post comments

im such a moron...i wish i was like you

Submitted by armlesspete on May 21, 2003 - 06:30.

yeah well, you can dictate about your narrow minded views all you want...i was just trying to make the point that its stupid getting so stressed about being sent flash or html if you've fucking signed up for it...if it bugs you so much why dont you just stop signing up for stuff. you talk about how you ban and delete them immediately and then hate whoever sent it to you..well whatever, everyone gets spammed why go on about it? its your fault if your names on a mailing list, and if its not your fault there are things you can do about it (spam cop etc).

login or register to post comments

insert condescending phrase here

Submitted by electro on May 21, 2003 - 13:41.

Oh my goodness you are so ignorant!

WOW, so you think that people SIGN UP for spam? hehehe, thats a joke. U must be really new to this 'internet' thingy, eh? Spammers 'harvest' peoples emails from all over the net (newsgroups, webpages, just guessing ect), and once you are on that list, you have had it, hello to 40 spam emails a day.

I have narrow minded views? Please tell me which of my views are narrow minded

Ok man, last thing, no need for that bad language here, you don't win arguments that way.

peace, i'm like a light - OUT

login or register to post comments

ROTFLMAO

Submitted by urlborg on September 5, 2003 - 05:06.

It's just wonderful that spammers have time to muse about which sort of tasty spam they intend to deliver to the hapless morons who would be stupid enough to even open email with HTML in it, let alone allow someone who they do not know or trust email a webpage that could destroy their entire operating system by simply being viewed in a dangerous application like Outlook Express!!!

By far and away, my Eudora filter that is the most totally effective against all spam and uce is the one that automatically classifies any incoming mail with html tags in it as Trash!

I certainly hope spammers really get into using Flash in a big way!

login or register to post comments

are you people for real?

Submitted by oOaurOra on February 9, 2004 - 13:49.

Youve got to be kidding me. Don't open e-mail that is HTML based? Is this some sort of midevil joke? I'm not sure how old you people are or what part of the planet your living on, but you don't seem to have a good grasp on what's going on in the digital world. Flash is the next step in the evolution of the internet. Did you say the same thing when images were first incorporated into web and e-mail? I know, lets all go back to bbs systems that run on asci. Maby it's just because I live in NYC where NOBODY has anything but broadband. The world is going multimedia and you people who sit arround and bitching about it are going to be left far behind. EVERY college student i know plans on having broadband in there homes after finishing school. We EXPECT multimedia. If it's not, you will not have our interest. What the hell was that idiot saying about cell phone imagery. It's a first step. First imagery, next video.... Eventualy.. oh shit.. wait... it's here... 1KTV.. hum cnn on my cell phone. Also, what the hell was the guy saying about a 400% performance increase? Do you have NO clue how images work. We allready have created a 400% performance increase. It's call a .gif file. Origionaly images were what we call tiff files. No compression. Very large. Now small. Are any of you even designers? Do any of you even work in the industry of design and development. Flash is even replaceing java and many others text based scripting formats. Why the fuck would a company pay a java scriptor, html designer, and a flash designer to do an applet/web site when you can pay a flash developer to do it all. The world is changing. You can either change with it, or be replaced by someone who does.

login or register to post comments

electro is sensitive about his small... connection

Submitted by bigbadbob on April 20, 2004 - 10:40.

Rather aggressive, Electro. Is this a sensitive issue for you? You have 56k and you want us all to limit ourselves to your archaic standard? Would you be more comfortable if we cut six inches off our... connections too?

Seriously though, you have a slow connection, you use 3rd party clients that bounce content that may be too big for you. Is that not enough? You and your 56kb/s are safe from Flash and HTML. I can pull down 10Mb/s and I enjoy rich flash, and quality video/audio. Personally, I like flash for the very reason that it has more of an Indie feel. Very few profit scammmers and spammers use flash because it is less accessible to search engines. Flash is primarily a way of providing slick and useable interfaces / applications. Yes people use it to make powerpoint-esque words flying in from the side, blinking and such, but people also have run very successfull scams and spams with plain text emails. Which of the low lifes are worse? I can send you a fat plaintext mail that will take you an hour to download too. Flash could do things for useability years before applets and dhtml could.

Point is... you protect your small... connection however you have to and we'll enjoy ours. In fact I'm enjoying mine right now.

What we need is for all the clients(Outlook, OE, IE, especially PDAs and Cell Phones) to use smart download features, like custom set banwidth warnings. If the page or mail object you request is above a certain size ask me if I want to download it. My cell phone should not start downloading a full 500kb website if I wanted the wap version. I wouldn't just go off and disallow particular delivery systems, when they can be smaller in bandwidth, than the tried and true html and bmps. The issue is with the clients bulldozer attitude towards bandwidth. Smarter bandwidth use schemas in our client apps is what I say.

login or register to post comments

I agree

Submitted by Apalamen on June 24, 2004 - 20:12.

I have seen arguments like this over the decades. Stop using ANSI graphics, its slowing my 300 baud modem down... Then it went everywhere... People like to argue just for the sake of having something to argue about... I dont want to appear like a Shrink or anything, but this Flash/Email argument has two sides. If someone could politely program some sort of then maybe it would make it easier? I guess if someone gets the job done incorrectly, then marketing campaigns of any sort would reflect this consumer-hatred and stop doing it. Wouldn't they? Marketing Departments and Online Email Marketing Corporations "via Spyware" can grab your emails and viewer preferences without your permission, by watching your habits, so why can't they design a better email mousetrap using more tasty looking cheese? :) PS> I have had my email accounts for more than a year and I don't really receive much SPAM on my primary email accounts. I call that intelligence... You won't find me on any of EVOLT.ORG mailing lists, or in my user-viewable account information - atleast that is what EVOLT stated in its OPT-OUT features... I just surf carefully and read TERMS OF USE and PRIVACY DISCLAIMERS on most websites I use... PSS> What happens if you do like professionally-done animation, and you have broadband? Are you speaking for all of the Internet Population? Of course not, you, like many of us are ticked at the SPAM your continually getting and the maybe even the SPYWARE that's on your system watching you to enter your email address somewhere on their sites... I do know the difference between OPT-IN, OPT-OUT, Permission-based Marketing utilizing GeoMarketing Email Technology... doesn't everyone? No this isn't a commercial, its just the way I write...

login or register to post comments

The access keys for this page are: ALT (Control on a Mac) plus:

evolt.orgEvolt.org is an all-volunteer resource for web developers made up of a discussion list, a browser archive, and member-submitted articles. This article is the property of its author, please do not redistribute or use elsewhere without checking with the author.