Skip to page content or skip to Accesskey List.
Search evolt.org
evolt.org login: or register

Work

Main Page Content

Don't panic about GIFs!

Rated 0 (Add your rating)

Log in to add a comment
(6 comments so far)

Want more?

 
Picture of Ratface

Steve Cook

Member info | Full bio

User since: August 29, 1999

Last login: August 02, 2000

Articles written: 11

For those of you who don't read Slashdot, there's a post at the moment which suggests that Unisys are likely to be cracking down on all Web sites that carry gifs, whether they were generated by licensed software or not. Before you fall for the hype, I felt I should point out some slightly more sober truths about this rumour.

  1. The Unisys page that was used as the source for this post *actually* says that if you are using gif creation software made by a company that does not have a license to provide LZW compression, or you are using an unlicensed copy of their software, then you should pay a license to Unisys ($5,000 or $7,500 depending upon the type of license).

  2. If, however, you are running a licensed copy of a program like Photoshop, then you are completely within your rights to use as many gifs on your site as you wish. (Unisys also say that "Unisys does not require licensing, or fees to be paid, for non-commercial, non-profit GIF-based applications, including those for use on the on-line services." ( http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/Patents/Gif/unisys.html ) This means that free applications that create gifs, such as The Gimp may also create "legal" gifs. Check your software supplier's license if you are particularly worried about this.)

  3. If you have gifs on your site that someone else created with licensed software you are not breaking their licensing agreement.

  4. Even if you did have unlicensed gifs on your site, it would prove *extremely* difficult for Unisys to actually prove this. The gif standard does include space for header details in the gif code, but it is quite easily modifiable.

  5. Finally, as the Unisys patent is a US patent, based on a flaw in the US patent system, I cannot see that this would be enforceable outside the States.

So these points aside, the action by Unisys raises some interesting issues. Will an increased level of hype surrounding this issues result in a quicker adoption of the PNG graphic format as standard? Are we going to see the creation of even more "standards"? How would Unisys go about enforcing something like this - especially outside America?

Of course, many people are up in arms about this latest news. When Unisys first forced Compuserve to introduce licensing for all programs that create gifs there was an outcry that died down pretty quickly. It looks like we are starting to see the same reaction again. (Check out the Burn All Gifs Day Web site).

There is indeed some cause for concern. If I were an American, I would be pretty upset about a patent law that allows for the patenting of common calculations. The situation also raises some pretty scary issues about the possibility of other patent holders of commonly used algorithms introducing licensing schemes. One group looking at these issues is the League for Programming Freedom.

I would be interested to hear the thoughts of other evolting people on this - but remember, this is not something to panic over. The Slashdot piece has already provoked a storm of well meaning, but misguided opinions. Be sure to read up on the issue a little before doing anything strange like removing all gifs from your site - but by all means consider beginning to introduce PNG's into your work instead.

Everything you ever needed to know about me can be found at Cookstour.org.

Submitted by cranstone on August 30, 1999 - 10:05.

It will be impossible to enforce a US Patent outside the US, unless they have worldwide Patent status which I doubt

login or register to post comments

Submitted by Ratface on August 30, 1999 - 10:22.

*Addendum* It has been pointed out to me by Slashdot user JoeBuck (thanks for the tip) that the link to the Unisys information stating that free software products are not required to pay a royalty is actually old information. Apparently, Unisys are now requiring payment from all software manufacturers, putting the likes of The Gimp in a difficult position. Do they continue to supply their software for free, but fork out the money for a license for LZW compression, or do they drop the gif format from their products? This is perhaps the most heinous part of this whole affair and it remains to be seen how the Open Source community will react. Watch this space...

login or register to post comments

Submitted by kermit on August 30, 1999 - 20:14.

There is one other point about Unisys's recent attempt to collect revenue from people using GIFs. First: a GIF is data. It's not Unisys's patented compression scheme. It's the result of that scheme within a wrapper of the GIF format. I'm not a lawyer (although I play one in Quake) - but I don't recall any patent laws that would give Unisys domain over the data produced by their compression method. Especially when that data could possibly be someone else's copyrighted artwork. Second: In US law the burden of proof is upon the claimant. In this case, Unisys. Unisys is quietly ignoring that and is attempting to make webmasters assume the burden of proof. If Unisys popped onto Evolt.org and said, "Hey gang, security.gif there on your site was produced using unlicensed code and here's the proof." and asked you to remove it, that would be appropriate. Asking everyone else to police every GIF graphic is not appropriate procedure. It is up to Unisys to actively defend their patent, not passively defend it. My opinion only.

login or register to post comments

Submitted by neksys on August 31, 1999 - 20:33.

Wrong! and I quote from the Unisys web page (which probably requires a license, too! :) ): License Information on GIF and Other LZW-based Technologies More and more people are becoming aware that the reading and/or writing of GIF images requires a license to use Unisys patented Lempel Ziv Welch (LZW) data compression and decompression technology, including United States Patent No. 4,558,302, Japanese Patent Numbers 2,123,602 and 2,610,084, and patents in Canada, France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom. Since January of 1995, Unisys has entered into almost two thousand license agreements for use of GIF and other LZW-based technology. .......... Does this apply to just storing or serving GIF images on a web site? Yes. See below: Web Site LZW Licenses Available from Unisys Because demand for LZW-related technology by Web developers continues to grow, Unisys wants to make obtaining a license for Web-based use of the LZW technology as easy and as straightforward as possible. Unisys therefore announces a new way for operators of certain types of Web sites to obtain an LZW license. If you are the operator of an Intranet Web site or an Internet Billboard Web site (see detailed definitions) and use the types of images covered by the LZW patent, you qualify. Types of images covered GIF, TIFF-LZW, PDF-LZW images or other LZW graphical formats used in connection with the creation, operation or maintenance of a Web site. Now, reading further, you will find out that under certain conditions, a not-for-profit BBS or web server with no commercial use or any items for sale may use GIFs _IF_ the operator applies for a written waver from Unisys. This waver may be provided at no charge, if Unisys so decides. Without the written waver, or the $5000 license, _NO_ use is allowed. The full text is here: http://corp2.unisys.com/LeadStory/lzwfaq.html For lawyer-speak, it is pretty clear.

login or register to post comments

Submitted by SienkRJ on September 1, 1999 - 17:27.

lzwfaq.html is a Unisys press release from 1-10-95. If you folow Ratface's MIT link, it takes you to another Unisys press release (probably of similar vintage) which clearly states that only the firms who sell the "enabling software" would be expected to obtain a license." BTW, I ran a search for news articles about this subject. Most of them were of '95 and '96 vintage, except for one Chicago Trib. column (Silicon Prairie) dated 6/18/98 - "Are your GIFs Legal?" - which basically says that Unisys isn't going to go after individual noncommercial Webmasters.

login or register to post comments

Submitted by omnimax on September 9, 1999 - 23:11.

A) A gif cannot be illegal, only the process of generating one with LZW compression when that compression engine is not licensed. If I recall correctly, even decompression is free to all. B) From what I remember from some time ago, I was under the impression that GIF89a did NOT use LZW. Could someone verify this for me? If this is the case, and since most people do not use GIF87 anymore, this shouldn't be an issue.

login or register to post comments

The access keys for this page are: ALT (Control on a Mac) plus:

evolt.orgEvolt.org is an all-volunteer resource for web developers made up of a discussion list, a browser archive, and member-submitted articles. This article is the property of its author, please do not redistribute or use elsewhere without checking with the author.